We know very little about Jesus. We know lots about what people
said and wrote about him after his death. But the man himself is largely hidden
from us. We know that his name was Yeshua, and that he was a Jew living in
ancient Palestine. Historians suspect, for complex reasons that we need not get
into, that Yeshua was taken in by an ascetic preacher named John.(1) This man initiated Yeshua into an
apocalyptic strain of Judaism. This did not mean that Yeshua believed
in our modern, cinematic version of the apocalypse—there was nothing of the End
of the World in Yeshua’s words. He preached the arrival of a divine revelation,
an unveiling of higher meaning and truth. God had touched down as a holy
presence, ending the need for complex ritual and dogma. Yeshua took this message with him to Jerusalem during the busiest, most volatile day of the Jewish calendar.
Local Roman authorities cruelly executed him shortly afterwards for nothing more than disturbing an already fragile civic peace. And that’s
more-or-less what we know. Yeshua did not refer to himself as the son of God or
as the anointed one, the Messiah or Christ. Those claims came later, as did stories of Yeshua's miracles and bodily resurrection.
Among the many things that we definitely do not know about Yeshua
is the date of his birth. I am not surprising anyone when I report that the
Christ Mass is celebrated on December 25 as part of a medieval Catholic attempt
to convert non-Christians who celebrated the Winter Solstice. As such, Christmas
is yet another thing obstructing our view of Yeshua, making us see what was not
there. Which is unfortunate because the message of Yeshua is one worth
preserving, whatever your beliefs. Yeshua’s God was an immediate presence, one
beyond churches and superstitions. To quote Thomas Sheehan, “In Jesus’ preaching, the
happening of forgiveness, the coming of the kingdom, was entirely the
initiative of God. And yet at the same time it was not an objective event that
dropped out of the sky. God became present when people allowed that presence by
actualizing it in lives of justice and charity.”(2)
Behind all the dogma, myth, historical confusion, colonialism, and
commercialism behind and surrounding December 25th, there is a
moment waiting for us—a parallel world of human simplicity, existing
simultaneously with our own. One of the spiritual goals of the strands of
Christian asceticism that provides the core to modern Systema, obfuscated by
politics, consumerism, and a martial emphasis, is the actualization of this
parallel world. Systema—at its core—seeks, after the words of one of the oldest
letters of early Christianity, to transform its practitioners into foreigners
and exiles with respect to the world, to inspire a transition from regular time
to messianic time, “the time that remains between time and its end.”(3) As sojourners in this world, we place our faith in the sky and the
heavens, the ever-present moment of opening that is human being, and the
feeling of immenseness that accompanies that moment.(4)
The conversion of Ebenezer Scrooge, in Dicken’s Christmas Carol, is one from regular
time to messianic time. Scrooge becomes a sojourner, faithful to the opening,
enacting God’s presence in a life of justice and charity. He learns the true meaning of Christmas.
I saw a woman on the street today. She was speaking loudly into
her phone, appearing agitated, but not speaking words of anger. She was
stressed and frustrated. There was a doctor’s appointment to attend, family
coming later that day, and some other difficulties. She looked hurt. Like life
had taken something from her and she didn’t even realize it. Listening to her I
thought of what Christmas had become. And then I remembered what it could be.
(1)
Biblical scholars employ at least four criteria when determining
whether elements of the gospel material are authentically historical: dissimilarity,
coherence, multiple attestation, and language and environment. Whatever is
reported of Yeshua that is dissimilar from the early Christian church or
ancient Judaism, is coherent with other elements that are likewise dissimilar,
written of in separate, unrelated sources, and typical of Aramaic speech and
the cultural patterns of early Palestine, is probably authentically historical.
See Sheehan, The First
Coming: How the Kingdom of God Became Christianity (Random House,
1986): 25
(2)
Ibid: 67
(3)
Agamben, The Church and the
Kingdom (Seagull, 2012): 1-8
(4) Nancy, God, Justice, Love, Beauty: Four Little Dialogues (Fordham, 2011): 15-16
(4) Nancy, God, Justice, Love, Beauty: Four Little Dialogues (Fordham, 2011): 15-16
No comments:
Post a Comment